By: Tammy Cardwell
Visit any of the used curriculum boards and what
will you find? You will find, for sale, consumable workbooks that have
supposedly never been used. Yes, some of them truly haven’t
been used –
perhaps the curriculum, when it arrived, wasn’t right for the
family,
or maybe it proved to be too easy for the student and Mom had to
replace it with something else. This is not always the case.
There is a scenario that plays out in homeschooling households
all
over. It begins with a homeschooling parent on a tight budget. Mom (or
Dad) decides she must have a certain curriculum for her children, but
it is costly, so she develops a plan. She will purchase the curriculum,
photocopy the consumable pages so that the book is preserved, and then
she will resell the curriculum so that she can recoup some of her cost.
There are many variations on this plan, of course. Down the
street,
another homeschooling parent sits with curriculum she has borrowed from
a friend. She, too, will photocopy or scan and print pages so that the
curriculum can be preserved and returned to its owner. Both parents
think of themselves as frugal homeschoolers, but in both cases, if the
parent has chosen to make copies of the workbook, unless the publisher
has made special provision, “frugality” is another
word for theft. No,
they are not merely being frugal. They may have done this with the most
honest of intentions, but they have stolen nonetheless.
No, they won’t be hauled off to the police station.
This kind of
theft isn’t considered a crime under criminal law. However,
there are
civil statutes that address the limits on copying other
people’s work.
You see; there’s this thing called copyright. It
means that the
producer of the material has certain rights concerning the way that
material can be copied. When one of us purchases a
publisher’s
material, curriculum in this case, from either the publisher or a
homeschool supplier, we are purchasing it with the understanding that
the copyright owner has certain, specific rights. These rights are
governed by law, and some of the law’s details may appear on
the
copyright page. US copyright law makes it clear that it is illegal to
copy the material except in very specific instances.
Many believe that educational fair use allows them to copy any
work,
but that’s not true. The congressionally endorsed
“Guidelines for
Classroom Copying” state that single or multiple copies for
the
classroom must be brief: a chapter from a book, an article from a
publication, a short story or short poem, one illustration (chart,
graph, picture)... In addition, multiple copies for classroom use must
be spontaneous. The time between discovering the piece and the need to
use it in the classroom must be so short that it is unreasonable to
expect a timely response to a request for permission to reprint. The
guidelines further state that multiple classroom copies must abide by
the “cumulative effect test” and include copyright
notice on each page.
The cumulative effect test states that copies must be made for only one
course in the school, limits the amount of work an educator can copy
from one author, and that a total of nine instances of multiple copies
is the limit for one course during one term. Exclusions apply to
current events and news articles. Even if all of these guidelines are
followed, there are still several prohibitions that must be obeyed.
- A teacher cannot make copies to create her own anthology,
compilation, or collection of works, whether she specifically
accumulates them or copies and uses them separately. In other words,
one cannot create her own short story collection that includes
copyrighted works.
- It is also unacceptable to copy from consumable works. This
includes workbooks, exercises, standardized tests, testbooklets, and
answer sheets or anything similar. The prohibition section states that
one cannot make copies as substitutes for purchasing books,
periodicals, or reprints.
- Nor can copying be directed by higher authority –
a school board can’t tell a teacher that she has to violate
the guidelines.
- In addition, an educator cannot make the same copies from
term to term. For instance, if she want each of her children to study a
particular, copyrighted short story in third grade, she needs to
consider buying, or checking out from the library, the book containing
this story, as copying it from term to term violates copyright.
The guidelines include more specific directions as to amount
of material that an educator can copy. You can read them at the Association
of American Publishers.
Unless the publisher has specifically granted permission for
copies,
one cannot make copies that fall outside these guidelines and still be
in compliance with the law - not for extra students, not for sharing
with homeschool friends, not with the intent to resell the original
book later. Yes, going back to our earlier examples, this means that if
the book is a consumable workbook, unless the publisher has granted
special copy permissions, a homeschool mother cannot make extra copies.
Some parents choose to have students write answers on separate sheets
of paper and this is perfectly legal (If, perhaps, unethical?). Other
than that, extra students each require their own, purchased copies.
That, convenient or not, is the law. It is also important to note that,
since March 1, 1989, a copyright notice does not have to appear in the
book for the copyright laws to apply to the work.
“But that’s not fair!” some
might cry. Or perhaps the exclamation
is, “No one does it that way!” This second
statement, of course, is
ridiculous; every parent knows that, “But everyone is doing
it!” has
never been an acceptable excuse. The first statement, however, many
homeschool publishers agree with to a point. This is why they either
offer extra student books at reduced prices or add extra clauses to
their copyright notices, granting the purchaser more rights than the
standard notice allows. Cindy Rushton, for instance, includes an extra
proviso in her copyright notice in one book that I have on hand. I
include the complete copyright notice here, to illustrate the wording
of a standard notice, highlighting her extra clause.
No portion of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopy, recording, or otherwise, without expressed written
permission from the publisher. Permission is granted for
copies of reproducible pages to be made for use within your own family.
This is a generous move, and one that Mrs. Rushton is in no
way
required to make, but she’s a homeschooling parent too (Most
homeschool
publishers are!) and she’s on a tight budget too (Most
homeschool
publishers are!), so she understands the financial needs of a family
and helps in any way she can. Note, however, that she is not giving
anyone the right to make copies for other people.
At least one publisher goes even further than this. On the
copyright
page of LightHome Publications titles, you will find the following note.
We want to be sure you know that our curriculum materials are
REPRODUCIBLE, meaning that the purchaser is allowed to copy any and all
pages for multiple children in the same family
(emphasis mine), as often as needed. That is our family friendly
policy. In addition, if you know of a needy home schooling family who
need this book, you may make copies for them as needed, if
they truly cannot afford adequate curriculum. (Again,
emphasis mine)
This is a rare and generous offer that is inspired by both the
owners’ homeschooling history and a concern for homeschoolers
who may
be at risk legally because they cannot afford adequate curriculum to
meet their state’s requirements. As owner Joy Marie Dunlap
explained to
me in email…
Our specific policy is worded as the Lord showed us as we
prayed. If
a home schooling family cannot otherwise afford to provide their
children with a fully adequate home education (i.e., if there is any
lack that could become a legal liability along the lines of educational
neglect due to lack of adequate materials in ANY aspect of their
children's education), we want our customers to feel free to share our
LightHome curriculum as needed with that home schooling family.
We are determined that no home schooling family ever get in
trouble
for anything we could help with. That is the carefully prayed-through
reasoning behind our copyright notice.
Here is a company that has chosen to make a generous exception
where
the right to copy (copyright) is concerned. It is necessary, however,
to remember that they are the exception, and that even their exception
has specific boundaries. It a homeschooling mother steps outside the
boundaries of the specific copying rights that they grant, she has
violated copyright law.
Too, the buyer may have been granted the right to make copies
for extra children within their
household, but they were not given the right to make copies for the first
child. The book remains a consumable item
and the publisher expects the buyer to consume
it – not to preserve it and resell it. Consequently, the one
who
purchases a consumable product, makes copies for all their children,
and then resells the workbook as unused is taking advantage of the
publisher’s generosity and then cheating them of another
family’s
purchase.
Since I first wrote this article, I have been asked in more
detail
about parents who, rather than copying consumable books, simply have
their children write their answers in a notebook or on a separate piece
of paper so that the workbook remains in a condition that allows for
reselling. What I said earlier still stands; this parent is not
technically violating the letter of the copyright law, because they are
not making copies. However, the intent of copyright law is to protect
the publisher from losing money. The idea behind limiting the right to
copy is that one does not make copies to avoid buying the book. If the
parent is having a child write his answers on a separate sheet of paper
specifically so that they can preserve the book for resell, then at the
very least they are doing it to avoid paying full price for the book.
Is this ethical?
Think about it from the author or publisher’s point
of view. Between
them, the people involved in this project have almost certainly
invested more than a year of their lives in this one book. The
potential buyer may look at it and see that it is a certain-sized book
selling at a specific price, and judge whether or not the book is worth
its cost, but purchasers are not simply buying a bound stack of paper.
They are buying access to the ideas that someone has labored over, both
to conceive and then to present in a usable manner. Buyers are not
merely paying for the book and its manufacturing costs. They are paying
the author, the copy editor, the designer, the publicist, and more.
They are paying for the printing, the advertising, the shipping of
review copies, the author’s travel expenses as he goes to
book
signings, and more.
What? A book’s price includes all of these things?
Of course! How
else are these expenses to be recouped? Each book sold puts the
publisher closer to making a profit – or, much more common,
hopefully
at least breaking even. Publishers risk a lot every time they publish
new books. The risk is compounded when others steal from them by acting
as if they have rights that they have never actually purchased. The
Bible says that the laborer is worthy of his reward (1 Timothy 5:18)
and, in this case, the laborers are not paid adequately when parents
make copies of curriculum.
Since homeschoolers tend to follow this copy/sell path in the
name
of saving money, perhaps it would help to consider the money situation
from the other side.
A publisher prints a book. Let’s say the book sells
for $20.00. Most
of the book’s sales will not be direct; they’ll be
through
distributors, wholesalers and bookstores, each of which gets a hefty
discount. On average, that works out to about 50%, so the publisher is
now down to $10.00 on the book. If the publisher printed a massive
quantity of books up front (Which most homeschool publishers cannot
do!), and did well on his printing costs, he paid around $3.00 for the
book, which brings his presumed profit down to $7.00. No book sells if
it is not advertised, so he’ll have sent out review copies
(which costs
money), put it on his website (which costs money), put ads in various
places (Which costs huge amounts of money!), gone to book signings and
made conference appearances (Need I repeat myself?), etc., to the tune
of about $1.00 per book, or more. Now he’s down to a per-book
profit of
$6.00 or less.
I could keep going, taking out all of the company’s
overhead
(storage for thousands of books, electricity, employee pay, telephone,
etc.), author’s royalties if the author isn’t the
publisher
(Self-publishing authors are seldom able to pay themselves royalties.),
and more, until you’d see that on a $20.00 book a publisher
is doing
well if he clears $2.00. And, in case it’s not obvious, our
fictional
publisher only clears that $2.00 per book if he sells all of the copies
he has printed; the expenses have to come out first. Believe me; as
much as the homeschooler on a budget needs to save money when possible,
the publisher has an equal or greater need to sell every book he can!
The publishing business is just like any other; if you lose enough
money you’ll stop publishing, and the homeschool world has
already lost
some great curriculum because of this one, simple, fact.
The next time you consider buying or selling on the used
curriculum
market, think carefully about the transaction before entering into it.
Was the book you are selling or purchasing copied in order to preserve
it for sale? The next time a friend down the street asks to borrow your
curriculum, consider her purpose. Does she plan to copy all of the
pages so she’ll not have to buy it herself? Is it really
worth
cheating, hurting, stealing from the publishers that work so hard to
provide homeschoolers with quality products? Is it worth facing the
possibility that they may not be around tomorrow when the next child
needs that curriculum you appreciate so much?
Call it frugality. Call it careful planning. Call it what you
will. Theft, by any other name, is still theft.
For more information about educational fair use and consumable
workbooks visit these sites:
Copyright © 2007
|